![]() |
|
|
|
Jeff Gaffney and Nancy Marley report, Mexico City, D.F. 3/8/06:
Aerosol light scattering and absorption instruments have been installed, calibrated, and are taking data at IMP. Currently single wavelength nephelometers being operated at differing RH (wet and dry) as well as a three-wavelength nephelometer (TSI Model 3550) taking data at ambient conditions. ANL is also operating a seven wavelength aethalometer and a single wavelength multi-angle absorption photometer (MAAP) systems to look at the aerosol absorption for comparison of various instruments as a function of absorbing aerosol loading. Black carbon levels are typically >10 microgram per cubic meter as determined by these instruments in the morning and average about 5 micrograms per cubic meter over a 24 hour period. The data is being taken as aerosol optical absorption.
T0 -- Instituto Mexicano de Petroleo (Mexican Petroleum Institute -- IMP)
Bob White and Nancy Marley at IMP setting up nephelometers, aethalometer and MAAP in lab on the rooftop of Bldg. 32 at IMP.
Also operational are high volume filters taking aerosol samples in two size ranges -- 1.0- 10.0 micron and 0.1 to 1.0 micron. The latter small fractions will be analyzed for 7Be, 40K, and 210Pb by gamma counting, 14C by Carbon Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, 13C/12C by Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry. Also 210Bi and 210Po measurements are planned and fractionated organic/elemental carbon samples will be used for 14 C determinations for source evaluation of biomass burning vs fossil (diesel engine) sources. Samples are being collected using timers at 12 hour periods, and portions of the samples will also be sent to the University of California, Irvine for analysis of key nitrate indicator species. Samples have been collected starting 3/1/06 in the PM.
<
br>
High Volume Samplers, one AM (5:30 am to 5:30 pm) and PM (5:30 pm to 5:30 am). View looking south from the roof of IMP towards the central part of Mexico City. This was taken on March 2, 2003.
ANL is also setting up instrument for ammonia and trying to get around problem of lost calibration gas sample (Mexican customs opened up the gas cell and turned stopcock so that the calibration standard was lost). Aerodyne Research has helped by getting us a known standard using permeation tube and we will attempt to align the system this evening.
Also at T0, Jose Jimenez has set up his AMS instruments and BNL also has set up aerosol instrumentation. Texas A&M (Collins group) is doing sizing experiments along with Univ. of Iowa group. So its getting a little crowded in the one rooftop laboratory.
Photos inside the Aerosol Laboratory -- Rooftop of Bldg. 32 IMP -- T-0, March 8, 2006
T-1 Update:
As of the 7 th , PNNL has gotten equipment at the T-1 and T-2 sites and is setting up. ANL trailer is operational and has been collecting high volume samples at that site similar to the T-1 sites as of March 4, 2006. Also being operated at both T-0 and T-1 by ANL are small weather stations (Vaisala -- sonic anemometers, RH, T, and Precipitation), and UV-B broad band instruments. The micro-pulse lidar is operating at the T-1 site and has been set up by Rich Coulter and Tim Martin. Aerosol samplers are being attended by UIC student, Nancy Martinez, and also by Mexican Students working under CENICA supervision -- TEAM CENICA (Roseola, Manuel, Abraham, and Rosemarie) who are doing a fine job helping Jeff Gaffney out with the sample collection. Also set up is a precipitation sampler and wet aerosol system -- in case we have the opportunity but for now it is exceptionally dry at both sites.
Nancy Martinez, UIC at right. Roseola and Manuel from TEAM CENICA at left. At Office at T-1 Technical University of Tecamac, State of Mexico.
Micro-pulse LIDAR
Output from LIDAR showing aerosol mixing to boundary layer.
Nancy Martinez at ANL trailer at T-1 with Hi-vol samplers and precipitation collectors in background.
Chris Doran reports:
As of Friday, March 10, The T1 and T2 sites were essentially fully operational. Each side has a three wavelength nephelometer, a PSAP, CPC, OCEC analyzer, Eppley black and white radiometer, and MFRSR. T1 also has a PCASP and AMS while at T2 there is a solar tracker with a NIP, a second Eppley to measure diffuse radiation, a radar wind profiler, and a radiosonde system. The sodar at T2 is nor operational due to the loss in transit of an essential cable.
On days when the G-1 is flying over Mexico City, 5 sondes are being released from T1 by ANL at 9, 11, 13, 15, and 17 local standard time (LST); if the G-1 is also flying to the north over T2, 3 additional sondes are released by PNNL at 11, 13, and 15 from T2. On other days, one afternoon sonde is being launched from both T1 and T2.
Conditions to date have generally been extraordinarily dry at the T1 and T2 sites. Figure 1 shows an example from a sounding at T2 in the early afternoon of March 10. Note the mixing ratio of less than 2 g/kg throughout the mixed layer, with even lower values above.
As was found in the 1997 IMADA-AVER, the mixed layer is shallow in the morning hours and grows rapidly sometime between 11 and 13 LST. This can be seen in the elemental carbon concentrations measured at T1 on March 10 and shown in Figure 2. Thee is a buildup during the morning hours followed by a sharp decline around noon. At T2 the peak values for the day occur later in the afternoon as the Mexico City plume is advected north. The rise in the organic carbon values is even more pronounced.
Figure 1. Profiles of potential temperature (left) and water vapor mixing ratio (right) measured at T2 on March 10.
Figure 2. Time series of organic and elemental carbon concentrations measured at T1.
|
DOE G-1 - March 2006
|
Submitted at(UTC): 2006/03/08 00:40
The objectives of our first flight was to assess operational status of instruments, become acquainted with air traffic control in MEX air space, and sample the urban plume which was predicted to be on the SW side of the Mexico City basin. Calibration equipment for many instrument is sitting in a trailer in Laredo, so assessments are provisional. Many instruments were down because stuff had not yet been delivered. We operated without NO, NO2, NOy, CO, PILS, peroxides, and the SP2; all but the SP2 rely on stuff that is safely ensconced in a seatainer in Laredo. McIvor type fixes have been implemented for all but peroxides and canisters.
Cooperation with ATC was excellent -- helicopter traffic was less than anticipated. Flight pattern consisted of a curtain over T1, transects to the W and S of the city, and an overflight of T0 at 1500' agl.
Ozone concentration reached 120 ppb, SW of Mexico City. Location was as predicted.
Pieces of this data set will be useful but for most instruments this was a test flight.
Return to calendar
March 6, 2006
Submitted at(UTC):
2006/03/07 22:12
Revised at(UTC): 2006/03/08 22:45
The G-1 flight pattern consisted of a box around Mexico City. Takeoff time had to be adjusted to not interfere with the President's visit to VER. Our 11:00 takeoff put us over MEX between 12:00 and 2:00 (LST). High pollutant concentrations were found in the S side of the basin in accord with model predictions. This area was sampled with 5 transects ranging from 9.5 to 15K' msl, the highest transect poking above the boundary layer. We were able to communicate with the King Air which had preceded us into this area and we were able to select altitudes based on their lidar observations. Ozone concentrations (see below) were below 100 ppb in areas that had high concentrations of CO and NOx. This situation is reminiscent of Phoenix. PTRMS should give information on a few VOCs and HCHO; canisters for VOCs have not yet arrived in VER. Air over T1 was clean. Fires were noted in several areas, most prominently on the east side of the basin. (See trace of light scattering coefficient below).
Stephen Springston reports:
Progress due to planning, diligence, ingenuity and cooperation among DOE researchers has been nothing short of amazing. We're still looking for the seatainer. Its presence would make our lives easier and our data better, but we're making useful measurements in a stand-alone fashion.
Flew an urban research flight today. See Flight Track below. Biomass burning was prevalent (see photos). The plane penetrated one of these plumes as part of the flight. Clean air was sampled at ~16000 ft. Multiple layers of pollution were observed and a rich data set obtained (though not as well calibrated as desired). Clean air north of the city and pooling of pollutants to the south was apparent. Fine structure of pollutant plumes was striking. The flight was turbulent, but not too toasty after takeoff.
The instruments operating included: PTRMS, AMS (some software issues require resolution), PILs (difficult to operate without supporting equipment, but Yin-Nan Lee has worked tirelessly), VUV-CO (using an N2 purge generously provided by EMSL/PNNL), O3, SO2 (previous problems resolved), three channels of NO, NO2, NOy (though not fully calibrated, nominal responses appeared reasonable and very high; kudos to Linda Bowerman for getting dry ice, and thanks to Carmen Benkovitz for assistance in translations), CAPS and PCASP probes, TDMA (kudos to Jian Wang for simplifying operator demands), the aerosol inlet flow appeared to be properly controlled starting this flight (thanks to Gunnar Senum and John Hubbe), CPCs (though the UCPC was frequently off scale, even with dilution), nephelometer, MFRs, Eppley radiometers and others. Only major systems not generating data were peroxide and the SPSP (which I'm told is being installed).
Preliminary processed data is being provided by this correspondent to PIs for inspection. Quick-look graphics are here. All data are PRELIMINARY.
We're all a tad stretched, but I think enthusiastic about what we've accomplished under the circumstances. Still no porta-potties. We've heard that the PNNL/BNL seatainer should leave Nuevo Laredo tomorrow. NCAR appears to have gotten some of their gear first to set up the ops center.
G-1 flight is scheduled for tomorrow March 7. Instrument suite will be expanded by the SPSP. Down day tentative for Wednesday March 8.
Submitted at(UTC): 2006/03/08 19:30
The G-1 flew the P-A pattern, identical to the previous day except for some shifts in altitude. Air was very clean to the east of T1, with pollutant levels increasing only slightly on a transect to the west side of the basin. As on the last several days, winds were from the north and highest concentrations of CO and inert tracers were predicted to be in the south side of the basin. The south side of the basin was sampled at 2900, 3300, 3600, and 4300 m msl, all within the boundary layer. Pollutant age was young as judged from NOx/NOy and high concentrations of primary pollutants. Ozone peaked at less than 100 ppb. Fires were observed on the east side of the city but too far south to be sampled.
Return to calendar
March 9, 2006 Two missions today!
Submitted at(UTC): 2006/03/10 18:59
The G-1 flew pattern H which consists of urban sampling to the west, south and across MEX, 3 transects over T1 and 3 transects over T2. On the ferry to MEX pollutant levels were much higher than previous days and sky was milky. Above the BL at 13000 ft msl, O3 = 27 ppb, NOy < 1 ppb, and accumulation mode particles 40 cm-3. Primary pollutants accumulated on south side of basin and over airport, NOx ~ 50% NOy, O3 ~ 70 ppb. Air cleaner to east. Over T1 and T2 at 9.5 and 11.5 K ft, NOy ~ 10 ppb, O3 ~ 60 ppb. This was more of a basin background than a distinct MC plume. The 12.5 K ft transects over T1 and T2 were above the BL and air was clean. Refinery observed at west end of T2 transects. CO is down because of unreliable ground power.
Return to calendar
Submitted at(UTC): 2006/03/10 19:28
The G-1 flew a modified pattern D consisting of 3 transects at 10, 11.5, and 15.5 K ft msl first over T1 and then over T2. Near VER there was a marine BL up to 3500 with much drier air above. At cruise altitude of 16 K ft msl, visibility to ground was impaired. Communication with King Air in flight was used to establish altitudes for transects. On west side of transects, pollutant levels were characteristic of a regional background; O3 = 70 ppb, scattering = 50 Mm-1, NOy = 7 ppb. Traveling from west to east there was a visible wall that looked like a dust storm.
On the polluted side, which we take to be the MC plume, O3 ~ 120- 130 ppb, NOy > 25 ppb, scattering > 120 Mm-1 (occasional excursion to 300 Mm-1). Aerosol components measured by AMS and PILS were not similarly elevated. Aerosol was strongly absorbing -- up to 60 Mm-1. Dew point on the polluted side was 12 degrees higher than on the less polluted west side. This feature was observed on the T1 and T2 transects at all 3 altitudes. Location of the polluted edge was near or slightly east of T1 and T2. Transects to the east did not extend far enough to get out of plume. Concentrations decreased slowly to the east. A refinery plume was observed on the west side of the T2 transects. Very high SO2 and NOx, but not much of a signal in the aromatic compounds observed by the PTRMS.
Plans were to follow the CMET balloon which was launched while the G-1 was doing T1 transects. Communication with the balloon worked but the balloon failed soon after it was launched.
Return to calendar
March 15, 2006 - - Two missions today!
Submitted at(UTC): 2006/03/16 22:00
The G-1 flew a shortened pattern in the AM. Purpose was to sample in source region with expectation of finding plume to N or NW later in the day. Haze in Veracruz with scattered Cu. Very clean air above. Altitude on the first T1 transect and over the city was 9.5 K ft. Very high concentrations of primary pollutants (CO > 1 ppm) on the west and south side of the city. Ozone up to 80 ppb. Periods with high CO/NOy ratios. There was no visibility. None at all. Scattering 300 Mm-1 with high absorption. SO2 low single digit ppb. Sulfate is a minor component of aerosol mass. T1 transect coming home at 10.5 K much cleaner than at 9.5. Evidently caught Mexico City emissions within a shallow boundary layer. In cleaner parts of the boundary layer there was a couple ppb of peroxides. Looking back on city on way to VER at 11:30 there was no indication of forthcoming convective activity later in the day. Power distribution for SP2 solved.
Return to calendar
Submitted at(UTC): 2006/03/16 22:03
The G-1 flew a modified pattern H which calls for 3 transects over T1 (10.5, 12.5 and 14.5 K ft); a loop on west, south and across city at 9.5 and 10.5 K ft; and 3 transects across T2 at 10.5, 12.5 and 14.5 K ft. Transects were to be shifted to the west relative to standard pattern in accord with Flexpart transport predictions. Highest O3 (~ 180 ppb) found on west side of city. Haze from morning still around in PM. Flexpart particle model showed most of plume staying near city which is what was found. T2 transects cut short because of Cbs. Up to 4 ppb peroxide outside of source region. CO and PTRMS not operational.
Stephen Springston reports:
Two flights on the 15th. We continue to reconfigure the power distribution
of the research instruments. Leaving the SP2 off for the first flight, we
seemed to have succeeded. Primary pollutants abounded! We had some of the
cleanest air (at altitude) and definitely the dirtiest air I've seen in
making these measurements. It was hazy, with light scattering approaching
250 Mm-1. CO exceeding 2 ppm was seen over a broad area. During the
return trip, we successfully tested turning on the SP2 on a different power
source.
Submitted at(UTC):
2006/03/19 23:37
The 2 objectives of the G-1 were to conduct an intercomparison with the C-130 and to sample the Mexico City plume in the T1 - T2 region. Flexpart and other models predicted the Mexico City plume to head north but miss T2 to the west. The intercomparison was supposed to start at the eastern leg of our standard T2 transect and continue to 100:04 longitude, about 80 miles west. On this first leg, the aircraft did not match up until the end. The return leg was more successful. Altitudes were around 12 - 13K ft. These legs included relatively clean air and a high concentration plume from Mexico City in the middle. Data will be examined to see if plumes from the Tula refinery and power plant were encountered. The G-1 also did 2 shorter legs over T2 and 4 legs over T1. While returning to Veracruz at 16K ft a region was encountered which visually appeared to be an intense dust storm. Most equipment worked.
Stephen Springston reports:
We flew wing-tip to wing-tip with the NCAR C-130.
During the turn around period before the second flight, repairs were made to
the PTRMS transformer. Over Mexico City, we dodged rain clouds, virga, hail
and lightning. Pilots did their usual excellent job of conducting the
research flight safely. Ozone in excess of 170 ppbv was noted.
Unfortunately we have no CO measurements for this flight. During climb out,
the power sagged on the research bus causing the CO analyzer lamp to
"flicker". All attempts to restart the lamp failed. We have seen this
behavior before and the restore procedure takes about three hours of ground
work. A UPS will be added to this instrument before flying again.
Return to calendar
March 18, 2006 (Ended March 19, UTC)
DOE G-1
Scientist Mission Summary Report (MILAGRO)
Author of report:
Kleinman
Mission Number:
9
Type of Mission:
C-130 intercomparison; T1-T2
Start of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/18 19:30
End of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/19 00:15
MISSION REPORT:
Submitted at(UTC): 2006/03/21 23:57
AM flight with takeoff at 10:00 to sample urban area and T1. Flight extended to give 2 T2 transects. High concentrations on west side of basin and on west side of T1 - T2 transects. Maximum O3 ~ 80 ppb at west end of T2 transect. Less O3 in city. Still very high aerosol concentrations in and out of city.
Submitted at(UTC): 2006/03/22 00:00
PM flight with curtain over T1 and T2. Flight duration limited by high runway temperatures. T2 legs extended to the east. Haze observed everywhere on transit to Mexico City. O3 never exceeded 60 ppb. Brown plume encountered on return east of Mexico City -- very high CO and aerosol concentration.
Stephen Springston reports:
Two flights today showed thin plates of very high pollution even at 16,000 ft.
One pilot remarked it was like flying inside of a frosted light bulb. Winds
were very confusing in the basin today and the flow was not straightforward.
Submitted at(UTC):
2006/03/22 00:02
AM flight starting at 9:30. Urban loop with transects across T1 and T2. Highest concentrations of primary pollutants in west of basin. O3 mainly about 40 ppb. On T1 - T2 legs peak of plume (blob?) west of T1 and T2. Thin haze layers traversed above boundary layer with enhanced particles and up to 60 ppb of O3.
Submitted at(UTC):
2006/03/22 00:04
PM flight starting at 2:00 with curtain over T1 and T2 -- 3 altitudes apiece. Mexico City plume found on T1 and T2 transects. Pattern sampled plume and clean air on each side. Centerline had moved slightly to east of T2 as models had predicted. Max O3 concentrations ~ 105 ppb.
Stephen Springston reports:
Well, we did it! Five flights in three days! The two flights today were
characterized as "An ideal Lagrangian!". We saw plenty of ingredients in
the morning flight and some good home (casa) cooking and transport of
pollutants by the afternoon. Instruments have been working well and the
flight crew have ironed most of the kinks out. We still had some power
limitations (trouble with SP2 on first flight), but these are not unexpected
when aircraft resources are being fully taxed.
Stephen Springston reports:
The flights keep a coming.
Submitted at(UTC):
2006/03/28 22:15
A morning intercomparison was scheduled with C-130 along T2 transect similar to 1st intercomparison. Of particular interest was the comparison of aerosol composition from PILS and AMS. King Air scheduled to overfly route. Result: C-130 delayed on ground. G-1 AMS not working. King Air laser not working. Best laid plans ... G-1 flight included passes over urban area T1 and T2. High concentration on west side of city.
Stephen Springston reports:
One flight today. We fared better than the NASA King Air now back in
Veracruz (but returned to the airport with instrument problems) and the
NCAR Hercules (delayed one hour with #2 engine problems and returned early
with #3 engine feathered). The absence of the Hercules was lamentable
because it was a second opportunity to intercompare measurements.
Submitted at(UTC):
2006/03/28 22:19
In an effort to beat the afternoon thunderstorms we started at 11:00. Did two loops around the city and 4 transects over T1. 50% cloud cover with bases at 11.5 K. Highest pollutant concentrations at west end of T1 transect. Plenty of primary pollutants but O3 just reached 100 ppb. As always, lots of aerosols.
Stephen Springston reports:
Flight today at 11:00 LST. That's flight 15, not counting the one aborted
flight. Not bad at all considering the conditions. For today, clouds were
building the whole flight. Found some pollutants in western edge of basin.
Haze was building as the flight went on, and so were the thunderheads.
Ozone exceeded 100 ppb a couple of times, but we never saw the high levels
expected given the CO and NOy levels. Humidity exceeded 80%.
Submitted at(UTC):
2006/03/28 22:21
Urban flight to sample early afternoon before thunderstorms canceled because of thunderstorms.
Stephen Springston reports:
Our last flight was done before we knew it. Today's scheduled flight
originally was a balloon chase, but the balloon didn't fly. Plan B was to
circumnavigate the basin, but cumulus activity and a bad oil-pressure
reading on the #1 engine scrubbed that idea.
A good explanation for the absence of high ozone levels with the presence of
sunlight, NOx and hydrocarbons has already engendered much discussion.
Return to calendar
March 20, 2006 - - Two flights again today!
DOE G-1
Scientist Mission Summary Report (MILAGRO)
Author of report:
Kleinman
Mission Number:
12
Type of Mission:
T1, T2 Lagranian
Start of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/20 15:32
End of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/20 18:17
MISSION REPORT:
DOE G-1
Scientist Mission Summary Report (MILAGRO)
Author of report:
Kleinman
Mission Number:
13
Type of Mission:
T1, T2 Lagranian
Start of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/20 20:00
End of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/19 22:58
MISSION REPORT:
Preliminary data from Saturday's intercomparison flight (03/18) were given to Sasha
Madronich. This is NOT a formal intercomparison, but rather a collegial
exchange designed to improve the quality of the measurement process. The
G-1 submitted all available measurements, but some were unavailable due to
conflicts between measurement responsibilities and processing demands. We
are all anxious to see NCAR's numbers and compare results. For me, it's
always exciting to have independent measures of all those numbers we
generate, process, analyze and publish from.
Our colleagues on the NASA J31 flew their last flight today and will be
leaving soon. The NASA King Air is still on the ground in Tampico. I'm
told the C-131 has a handle on it's cabin heating problems. The G-1 folk
are pretty wrung out after two 3-1/2 h flights, but we also think 7 - 9 h in
the C-131 with no windows is no picnic either. The Twin Otter has had FTIR
alignment problems, but is flying regularly.
Local weather is pretty darn hot (upper 30's), and a tad humid here in
Veracruz. Tuesday (03/21) is a down day for the G-1. Calibrations and data
processing will occupy most of Tuesday. Wednesday's schedule (03/22)depends on
weather.
Return to calendar
March 22, 2006
Take off at 09:30, we found humid air, lots of hydrocarbons and large areas
with total NOy well over 50 ppb in our first flight. Ozone approached 70 ppb. The full instrument complement was working well from all indications.
We were all anxious to see what would brew up in this cauldron by the
afternoon. All expectations were that the ozone production would be
significant. On the climb out, we noticed lots of puffy Cu's and a few not
so puffy ones (the kind that grow up to be thunder clouds). The weather
briefing at 13:30 led to cancellation of the afternoon flight. Though we
all wanted to measure in the afternoon, the convective activity not only would
make it unsafe, but also would vent the same soup we wanted to study.
Indications from Sasha Madronich are that the NOy signals compared well on the 3/18
intercomparison flight with the C-130. We're anxious to hear about other
species, but NOy was one we are particularly glad to see agreement with an independent measurement.
Return to calendar
March 26, 2006
DOE G-1
Scientist Mission Summary Report (MILAGRO)
Author of report:
Kleinman
Mission Number:
15
Type of Mission:
urban, t0, t1, t2 intercomparison
Start of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/26 15:45
End of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/26 19:00
MISSION REPORT:
The G-1
did well on it's flight except for problems with the AMS. We dodged cumulus
activity on the return and elected to forego a second flight due to weather.
Return to calendar
March 27, 2006
DOE G-1
Scientist Mission Summary Report (MILAGRO)
Author of report:
Kleinman
Mission Number:
16
Type of Mission:
urban, t0, t1,
Start of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/27 16:58
End of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/27 20:10
MISSION REPORT:
PTRMS reports
pretty heavy hydrocarbon loadings. So where's the ozone? The high clouds
did shade the region, we estimated 50% cloud coverage, but we still should
have seen more.
The G-1 was supposed to coordinate with the King Air, but they returned to
Veracruz with a faulty laser just as we were taking off. After a few well
placed taps, the laser started and they flew their mission.
G-1 instruments are running great considering this is the last week of the
program. The VUV-CO instrument is ticking smoothly.
The only major blemish on the roster is the AMS which appears to have a
short in the high-vacuum region and can't be repaired in the field (despite
tireless efforts by Mike Alexander and John Ortega).
We're getting near the end of the project. Take an extra moment for safety. Also begin
thinking about your "Lessons Learned" list for the program.
Return to calendar
March 28, 2006
DOE G-1
Scientist Mission Summary Report (MILAGRO)
Author of report:
Kleinman
Mission Number:
17
Type of Mission:
urban, t0, t1,
Start of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/28 15:30
End of Mission(UTC):
2006/03/28 15:30
MISSION REPORT:
We're thanking the locals without whose help this program would not have
been possible.
Return to calendar
Return to top
|
NASA King Air - March 2006
|
Submitted at(UTC):
2006/03/05 22:00
Revised at(UTC): 2006/03/07 14:35
Goals
* Overflight of stacked patterns from G1 flight plan "P" to acquire coincident
remote and in situ data and characterize aerosol distribution in the MC basin
* Overflight of T0 and T1 ground sites
* Survey south and southeast of Mexico City to locate plume as input to C130 flight plan for their 4 March flight
Intended Flight Plan
Flight Operations
Take off: 1817 UT
Landing 2140UT
Summary
* Mission proceeded as planned and data were acquired corresponding to all objectives.
Data were acquired over the G1 flight tracks and information on layer altitudes were radioed to the G1 when it arrived on station. Reports from G1 scientists indicated that this information was useful in selecting new altitudes for their stacked/wall patterns during their mission.
Lidar data images from this flight have been posted to the Research Products section of the MILAGRO Field Catalog.
B200
Flight_Track
1817
lidar_ASR532
1817
lidar_ASR532_3D
1817
lidar_ext532
1817
lidar_sa532
1817
lidar_wvd532
1817
Instrument Status
The HSRL and HySPAR instruments functioned nominally. The LAABS instrument
locked up a few times during the flight and had to be restarted.
This flight focused on acquiring coincident measurements in the Mexico City basin
with the G-1 and a survey of aerosol south and east of Mexico City as a scouting
mission to locate the Mexico City plume as an aid in planning the C-130 flight
for the following day.
Instrument Performance Summary
High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL): worked flawlessly throughout the flight.
Langley Airborne A-band Spectrometer (LAABS): worked well with the exception of
locking up briefly on two occasions.
Hyperspectral Polarimeter for Aerosol Retrievals (HySPAR): worked well throughout
the flight.
Flight track (with zoom over Mexico City) and plots of aerosol backscatter ratio, aerosol extinction, aerosol backscatter wavelength dependence, and total depolarization are available as a pdf file.
Return to calendar
March 6, 2006
Mission Report (pdf file)
NASA B200/MILAGRO-5 Flight Summary
6 March 2006
Goals
* Coordinated flight with the J31 on transit to Mexico City to acquire coincident HySPAR and RSP data
* Overflight of stacked patterns from G1 flight plan "P"
* Terra underflight; coincident data with MISR in Local Mode over Mexico City; overpass time = 1712 UT
* Overflight of the J31 spirals at T0 to acquire coincident extinction profiles
<
br>
Intended Flight Plan
Flight Operations
Take off: 1553 UT
Landing 1846UT
Mission proceeded as planned and data were acquired corresponding to all objectives.
It seems unlikely that we will be able to make the planned comparisons with the data from the J31. According to the J31 AATS-14 PI, conditions encountered during the J31 spiral at T0 were not conducive for accurate extinction profile from AATS-14 due to excessive horizontal variability over the spiral footprint. Preliminary reports indicate a similar problem existed for the RSP data from the J31.
Data were acquired over the G1 flight tracks and information on layer altitudes were radioed to the G1 when it arrived on station. Reports from G1 scientists indicated that this information was useful in selecting new altitudes for their stacked/wall patterns during their mission.
With respect to the orbits over the J31 spirals and G1 patterns, we note that it would be beneficial to execute passes with longer straight legs over the regions of interest rather than tight orbits. The instrument is programmed to block the transmitted beam when bank angles exceed 10 degrees, hence time spent in tight maneuvers results in loss of valuable data acquisition time.
Lidar data images from this flight have been posted to the Research Products section of the MILAGRO Field Catalog.
Instrument Status
B200
Flight_Track
1553
lidar_ASR532
1553
lidar_ASR532_3D
1553
lidar_ext532
1553
lidar_sa532
1553
lidar_wvd532
1553
The HSRL and HySPAR instruments functioned nominally. The LAABS instrument locked up a few times during the flight and had to be restarted.
Return to calendar
March 7, 2006
Mission Report (pdf file)
Goals
* Raster pattern over Mexico City and area south of MC basin to where outflow
was predicted
* Overflight of stacked patterns from G1 flight plan "P"
Flight Operations
Take off: 1700 UT
Landing 2048UT
Summary
Mission proceeded as planned and data were acquired corresponding to all objectives.
Lidar data images from this flight have been posted to the Research Products section of the MILAGRO Field Catalog.
B200
Flight_Track
1700
lidar_ASR532
1700
lidar_ASR532_3D
1700
lidar_dep532
1700
lidar_ext532
1700
lidar_sa532
1700
lidar_wvd532
1700
Instrument Status
The HSRL and HySPAR instruments functioned nominally. The LAABS instrument locked up a few times during the flight and had to be restarted.
Rich Ferrare reports:
Here are a few images to give an idea of what we have been up to...
The scattering ratio and extinction are extensive parameters, and wavelength dependence, depolarization, and extinction/backscatter ratio are intensive parameters. Initial looks show quite a bit of variability in terms of aerosol amounts, and less variability in aerosol intensive properties. However, the depolarization does show considerable variability, likely due to variability associated with smoke and/or dust.
Right now, we are collecting data at a rapid pace (~ 1 flight/day, sometimes 2/day), and so we are pressed to keep up with processing and creating such images. We will be placing these on the data archive as soon as possible.
1. 0307_flight_track1 shows the B200 King Air flight track from Tuesday, March 7. This was a "raster" scan pattern that we used in coordination of G-1 over Mexico City. The locations of T0, T1, T2 sites are indicated as well; we flew over T0 and T1.
Chris Hostetler notes:
We are getting spectacular data with the lidar. Our coordination with the G1 has been excellent so far. We have over-flown their routes on several flights and have relayed info to them on boundary layer height that they have used to adjust the altitude of their passes over Mexico City.
The plots all go to 8 km as a default. The King Air is limited to 28 kft. We fly as high as ATC allows us. Typically between 8 and 9 km. Most products are processed from just below the aircraft to the ground. The products involving extinction (extinction and extinction-to-backscatter ratio) are processed from 1 km below the aircraft to ground. For the plots that follow, the color scale has been set so that 0 is black.
Please note: All data shown on this page or linked from this page should be considered preliminary, "quick-look" data, and not for
use in presentations or publications.
Rich Ferrare continues:
3. 20060307_ext is the same, except for aerosol extinction (532 nm). HSRL, like Raman, directly measures aerosol extinction. Here vertical resolution is 300 m, and temporal resolution is 1 minute, which translates to a horizontal resolution about 6 km. Again, for the purposes of display, the image only shows every 20th profile.
| B200 | |
| Flight_Track |
1905 |
| lidar_ASR532 |
1905 |
| lidar_ASR532_3D |
1905 |
| lidar_ext532 |
1905 |
| lidar_sa532 |
1905 |
| lidar_wvd532 |
1905 |
| B200 | |
| Flight_Track |
0854 |
| lidar_ASR532 |
0854 |
| lidar_ASR532_3D |
0854 |
| lidar_ext532 |
0854 |
| lidar_sa532 |
0854 |
| lidar_wvd532 |
0854 |
| B200 | |
| Flight_Track |
1402 |
| lidar_ASR532 |
1402 |
| lidar_ASR532_3D |
1402 |
| lidar_ext532 |
1402 |
| lidar_sa532 |
1402 |
| lidar_wvd532 |
1402 |
| B200 | |
| Flight_Track |
1509 |
| lidar_ASR532 |
1509 |
| lidar_ASR532_3D |
1509 |
| lidar_ext532 |
1509 |
| lidar_sa532 |
1509 |
| lidar_wvd532 |
1509 |
| B200 | |
| Flight_Track |
1607 |
| lidar_ASR532 |
1607 |
| lidar_ASR532_3D |
1607 |
| lidar_ext532 |
1607 |
| lidar_sa532 |
1607 |
| lidar_wvd532 |
1607 |
| B200 | |
| Flight_Track |
1625 |
| lidar_ASR532 |
1625 |
| lidar_ASR532_3D |
1625 |
| lidar_ext532 |
1625 |
| lidar_sa532 |
1625 |
| lidar_wvd532 |
1625 |
| ASP Chief Scientist | Acting DOE Program Manager |
| Stephen E. Schwartz
Atmospheric Sciences Division Brookhaven National Laboratory Bldg 815E, 75 Rutherford Drive Upton NY 11973 (631) 344-3100 Fax: (631) 344-2887 Email: ses@bnl.gov |
Rickey Petty
Climate Change Research Division U.S. Department of Energy, SC-74 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington DC 20585-0002 (301) 903-5548 Fax: (301) 903-8519 Email: Rick.Petty@science.doe.gov |
|